|
As people have become more concerned about indoor air quality, there
has been a significant increase in the use of air cleaners to reduce particulate
levels. This has especially been the case with an exponential increase of asthma in children. The increased use of air cleaners
has allowed PGL researchers to look at the impact this has on radon decay
products exposures that account for the primary risk associated with elevated
radon gas concentrations in a home.
The good news is
that, when properly designed, installed and maintained
they can significantly
reduce radon decay products.
The even better
news is that devices now exist that can economically measure radon decay
products
to be able to determine the beneficial impact of these devices.
It is important to note that air
filters do not reduce radon, but they do reduce radon decay products.
To find a PGL professional who can assist you in determining the efficiency of
your air filter in reducing the health risk associated with radon click the
button below. Since this is an emerging field, you may also wish to
contact any individual who utilizes E-Perm technology who can arrange to obtain
a device for your individual measurement by contacting a PGL professional.

The following pictures and graphs provide information on how well air
filtration works in reducing radon decay product risks. Click on a
thumbnail image to enlarge it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Filter Concept |
|
Air circulation created by filter increases plate-out of Radon Decay Products as well as particles to which they are attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stand-Alone Whole House Filters |
|
Separate fans and ductwork operate separately from forced air unit or where no forced air system exists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Efficiency Filters for Forced Air Units |
|
Low pressure drop filters allow them to be added into the return ductwork. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Whole House Filter System (1) |
|
Radon is not affected, but decay products are significnatly reduced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Filter System (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Filter System (3) |
|
A follow-up measurement in this house indicated radon decay products continued to be controlled. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Extreme HEPA |
|
This is in a laboratory setting where very high circulation rates existed and a very tight HEPA filter was used. This building was slotted for mitigation and interior vacuums were so high (-0.150 in H2O) that several ASD systems would have been needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Air Circulation |
|
Much of the radon decay product reduction comes from simple air circulation. Filters enhance reduction and beneficially remove other particulates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on Unattached Fraction Analogy |
|
Although the percentage of the total radon decay products in the small particle range can increase, the overal exposure is reduced. See comment below from the National Academy of Sciences. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the mid 1990's much of EPA's research budget into new mitigation
strategies was reduced. This occurred at a point in time that air
filtration techniques were beginning to be studied, but not completely.
Consequently, some unanswered questions regarding the potential increased
dose from the use of air filters in increasing the unattached fraction was
placed in some documents and cast doubts on their use. However,
subsequent to this and with better instrumentation, researchers have shown
that although the unattached fraction goes up, so does the dose per unit
exposure increase, the overall exposure goes down sufficiently to
compensate for this.
This follow-up research was included in the US EPA driven research into
risk assessment of waterborne radon and within the section where alternative
mitigation techniques were reviewed and updated.
Risk Assessment of Radon in Drinking Water NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS,
Washington, D.C.
1999,
Pages
149-151
“From the
more recent studies on air cleaners and their effects on exposure to and
dose from airborne radon decay products, several important conclusions can
be drawn. With the new dosimetric models that more accurately reflect nasal
and oral deposition of ultrafine particles, it is extremely unlikely that an
air cleaner can reduce exposure and increase dose as suggested by Maher and
others (1987), Sextro and others (1986), and Rudnick and others (1983).
Thus, there is no reasonable likelihood that the use of an air cleaner will
increase the hazards posed by indoor radon.”
|