|
More and more administrative buildings are being tested for radon exposure to
employees. This is being done either as a proactive measure by the
employer or complaints by employees. Although OSHA has exposure guidelines
less stringent than EPA's recommendations, EPA's guidance is being interpreted
as reasonably achievable for workplace exposure. Radon testing is also
becoming very commonplace in apartment buildings as a means to avoid
landlord/tenant liability issues.
Radon can enter large buildings just as easily as homes. In fact, the entry
can be quite high if the heating ventilation and air conditioning system (HVAC)
is not balanced. The effects of the HVAC system on radon entry are
two-fold:
-
Large buildings are typically designed to
have fresh air introduced into the building via the HVAC system which would
serve to positively pressurize the building and reduce radon entry from the
soil. However, energy management strategies at times reduce or even
shut off the addition of fresh air, either deliberately or when control
components fail.
-
Also, large HVAC systems become unbalanced
for a given room where more air is drawn out of the specific room than is
supplied. This causes that particular room to be under negative pressure
that can draw radon in, if the room is in contact with the soil.
However, when these two conditions occur the HVAC
system is still operating and recirculating air within the building. The
simple air movement within the building, regardless of whether fresh air is
being added or the system is balanced can still significantly reduce the levels
of radon decay products within the rooms, and hence risk exposure, even if the
radon levels are elevated.
The following photogalleries provide some
examples where radon decay product measurements were helpful in either better
characterizing the risk or evaluating air filtration technology.
Click on thumbnail photos to
view pictures more clearly.
|
|
|
Hotel
This is a hotel where previous radon measurements indicated a problem in an employee area. Follow-up testing indicated that although radon was elevated, radon decay products were low, thereby avoiding mitigation costs in the several thousands of dollars. |
|
|
|
Paper Handling Facility
Previous measurements had indicated a potentil radon concern, Follow-up measurements indicated that although radon was elevated, the radon decay products were below the guideline. This was due to high air circulation rates and air filtration equipment in place to control paper dust levels. |
|
|
|
Impact of Console Air Filter on Single Room
A facility had a single room within it where radon levels were elevated. Due to security, the employee worked there under closed conditions. Follow-up measurements indicated that radon decay levels were even higher than what radon measurement would indicate. A small $120.00 filter was added. |
|
|
|
Impact of Console Filter Unit on EF
The small console unit in a small area was able to significantly reduce percentage of radon decay products in the air. In addition to reducing exposure, the employee greatly appreciated the "feel" of the room after the filter was added. |
|
|
Discussion: Often there are aspects of the building that are already in
place that is reducing radon decay product exposure, such as:
-
Air circulation systems (HVAC)
-
Gross particulate filters
-
Fine, localized air filters
With a radon gas measurement
only, the benefits of these systems are not detected. In assessing the
impact of these ancillary building systems, one has to ascertain if these
systems operate continuously, or certainly if they operate during occupied time
periods. If the answer is yes, then a decision made on radon decay
products is appropriate, provided information is provided to the client that
these systems are to be maintained, just like a regular radon mitigation system.
In cases where a perceived benefit is obtained (such as the addition of the air
filter to the example above), it is likely that occupants will make the effort
to maintain such a system-perhaps, even to a greater degree than they would
maintain an active soil depressurization system.
Caution: When doing
follow-up measurements using radon decay product levels as a criteria it is
important to also measure radon. This insures that the lower radon decay
product levels are a function of lower equilibrium factors and plate-out, rather
than an a lower radon gas level during the time of the follow-up measurement.
That is why PGL provides devices through its
manufacturing partners that measure BOTH radon and radon decay products!
|